A play on YouTube is enough!
Follow your own rules and roots
Once upon a time a certain Miss Amy Winehouse wished upon a Start…but you exclusively enjoy applauding all together synchronized.
Back to balck video is wrong Photoshop.
11:11 cover by Maluma is wrong Photoshop too.
…but what about Shakira’s burqa-botox?
10 years ago I was watching Chantaje by Shakira and Maluma with deliberately ugly camera shots and then three years ago, the horror of Shakira's bad manners and a whole world against a father in front of the eyes of two underage children because music makes you people dance. WOW.
The connection: Botox nowadays represents aesthetic and sexual standardization, according to me, like the dreams induced by a part of the world that remains watching and directing, according to its own taste, the life of those who seek a bit of happiness for themselves and sometimes for an entire Pueblo.
I take as a model the underrated Pamela Anderson who possesses a lifestyle that makes her worthy of the fame that still rightly supports her: "We have paradise beneath our feet. We must live a green economy and things will get better. We must protest, act, not fall into brainwashing and, as consumers, seek the truth."
This Lady is a No Botox Lady but do not go investigating her wrinkles in zoom-in, you will not see them anyway. Why? Ask yourselves while looking at yourselves in the mirror!
Who? The People? Or, I rhetorically ask myself, Shakira who does not prevent the construction of a golden statue of Herself in Colombia two years ago? Yes, precisely Her, since I was convinced that Shakira shared the same roots as J Balvin in the Tranquila “set” and it does not seem so looking at the backstage of Chantaje and btw: if I were Maluma's family relative, I would suggest them to never let their children meet Shakira's face in person, you never know. Sorry Maluma for sticking my nose into your business.
When I offensively say that Shakira has a burqa-Botox face I mean:
I got tired of watching those who take advantage of other people's ignorance rather than encouraging their aknowledgment (ignorance not only lexical or cultural but also of perception and honesty). Do you recall Amy’s press and photos and drugs (while it was alcohol instead) and videos in which she did not correspond to her own image of herself from a certain point onward until her never-again (?).
I repeat myself: be careful because they are trying to induce in us the desire for certain faces just as they induced in Brazil land dreams (it seems football is well known, then who knows..) that were not their spontaneous ones but in order to keep them “dependent” (property developers and luxury cars and therefore Botox).
Still about Botox: you told us that it must be done every six months or else it dissolves in six months. Similar but both wrong. It could be enough once in a lifetime, if the substance actually works as science has already widely said. Plus, Botox on the upper hands for general youthfulness NO! Otherwise science necessarily must invest badly if every time the aesthetics of a few arrives before the medicine for everyone else's health, therefore I believe I can consider Botox as collective scars, like AI inside Spotify.
Fortunately there still exist very rare dissidences: in Mala Mía by Maluma, the gender representation is perfectly appropriate whether the person had been gay or cis heterosexual. Apparently (and hopefully) it is still a little possible.
Here you are 10 years of cinema in real life about that. Don't you see?!
Shakira's statue, however, let it be wherever, in the Bahamas maybe, who knows.
Disappointed yes, never mean though!
- written by Simonetta Waïss